| Recruiting Comment | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 8:24 am | |
| Having trouble getting plays to commit and went through looking at ranked class's...some of you are doing well, looks like there may be a big boost when looking at 4* teams vs 3* Teams...here is a run down
4* Georgia Tech #2 class w/5 4* players 4* North Carolina #5 class w/4 4* players 4* Cincinnati #6 class w/1 5* 1 4* 1 3* players 4* Pitt #7 class w/2 4* 1 3* players 4* Kansas #9 w/1 5* players 3* Iowa #11 w/1 4* 1 3* players 3* Ole Miss #27 w/1 3* player 3* Arkansas #28 w/1 3* player 3* Illinois #51 w/1 2* player 3* TCU #118 3* Stanford #119 0 4* Oregon State #120 0 | |
|
| |
bludevilz444
Posts : 229 Join date : 2009-12-03 Location : Prosper Texas
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 8:31 am | |
| yeah that sucks the cardinals get no love lol but next year youll have a killer class and porbably will this year | |
|
| |
ggang21
Posts : 639 Join date : 2009-12-12 Location : Dallas TX
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 8:33 am | |
| yeah im just trying to stay in my range. Im just trying to get a bunch of 3*s and im shooting at like 3 or 4 4*s stars. Its hard because i took over the team in the middle of the season | |
|
| |
bludevilz444
Posts : 229 Join date : 2009-12-03 Location : Prosper Texas
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 8:35 am | |
| yeah ik where your comin from in q4tb v2 i took pitt in the middle my recruiting was fine by the time we restarted | |
|
| |
chAdyP0408
Posts : 437 Join date : 2009-11-18 Age : 34 Location : Denton, Texas
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 8:39 am | |
| The biggest thing for me is that with so few scholarships I'm able to spend over an hour on each recruit which makes it easier for me to sign guys but I can only sign fewer. As I sign recruits I get to spend more and more time on the fewer guys that I have left so once I got my first commitment it was like a snowball effect and a bunch of other guys signed in the following weeks | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 8:52 am | |
| - chAdyP0408 wrote:
- The biggest thing for me is that with so few scholarships I'm able to spend over an hour on each recruit which makes it easier for me to sign guys but I can only sign fewer. As I sign recruits I get to spend more and more time on the fewer guys that I have left so once I got my first commitment it was like a snowball effect and a bunch of other guys signed in the following weeks
ya, good point, your recruits must be feeling the luv you giving them | |
|
| |
chAdyP0408
Posts : 437 Join date : 2009-11-18 Age : 34 Location : Denton, Texas
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:06 am | |
| Ya it's crazy right now cause I only have three recruits so I spend at least three hours on each one lol | |
|
| |
ggang21
Posts : 639 Join date : 2009-12-12 Location : Dallas TX
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 10:59 am | |
| yeah i like to work with about 9 at a time so i can give each person at least a hour | |
|
| |
BucNutts
Posts : 2931 Join date : 2009-11-19 Location : Oklahoma
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 11:47 am | |
| Yea its a bummer seein ya all get some nice recruits, TCU cannot recruit worth a darn right now. I just got my first commit, a 3* OLB...although I think he will be a gem...b+ on speed, and great pursuit and coverage skills....
But my success with high 4* or 5* right now are not very high. | |
|
| |
ggang21
Posts : 639 Join date : 2009-12-12 Location : Dallas TX
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 11:56 am | |
| dont feel bad i only have a 2 star FS so we on the same page bro | |
|
| |
clevmire1
Posts : 580 Join date : 2009-11-17 Age : 37 Location : Sydney, Australia
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 12:36 pm | |
| i think you are all missing the point. i mean i dont care whether they are 3,4, or 5 star u gotta see who is gonna be good. u can get plenty of gem 3 star guys that come out rated in and around the 80's just like i have had plenty of 5 star recruits come out in the mid 70's. | |
|
| |
chAdyP0408
Posts : 437 Join date : 2009-11-18 Age : 34 Location : Denton, Texas
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Fri 18 Dec 2009, 1:45 pm | |
| That's very true but in general I would say five stars come out better rated than three stars | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment Sat 19 Dec 2009, 1:48 am | |
| - clevmire1 wrote:
- i think you are all missing the point. i mean i dont care whether they are 3,4, or 5 star u gotta see who is gonna be good. u can get plenty of gem 3 star guys that come out rated in and around the 80's just like i have had plenty of 5 star recruits come out in the mid 70's.
I get what your saying, and I have not really even gone after any 5* players...I think I have 3 or 4 4* on my board, but a majority of them are 3* & 2* and can't get them to even be a "soft" commit while my team is now #3 in the country....you would think a 2* RB I have been after, had a A visit, been #1 on his list for 6 weeks would pull the trigger?...very interesting though. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Recruiting Comment | |
| |
|
| |
| Recruiting Comment | |
|