| Week Fourteen Discussion | |
|
+4luvtotha9s ggang21 Coach Gruden LongGONE24 8 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 12:29 pm | |
| - clevmire1 wrote:
- firstly, dude relax this is what is good about the game it is fucked just like the real thing. secondly, we were even going into the final week even as, u beat a 2-3 loss ND ranked like 23 n i beat a one loss pitt ranked number 8.......
im not saying i deserve it anymore than you but as chady has said the game puts more weight on beating highly ranked teams later in the season. I'm pretty relaxed, had about 3 tanquary and tonics, so I'm not quit ready to off yet..but fux...if it was you, I'm sure you would be bummed mate.....by the way Macc, can you please put Cincy on my schedule next year? | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 12:30 pm | |
| - bludevilz444 wrote:
- its not pac 10 its preseason rankings man
you can't be that naive...who is voting and where do the live? | |
|
| |
chAdyP0408
Posts : 437 Join date : 2009-11-18 Age : 34 Location : Denton, Texas
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 12:33 pm | |
| Preseason ranking does have a lot to do with it. Look at 2004 when the top two ranked teams at the beginning of the season, USC and Oklahoma, both went undefeated and then preseason unranked Auburn also went undefeated. Look who eneded up in the championship WEST COAST USC and not undefeated Auburn who ran the gauntlet known as the SEC because they were never going to jump either team because they started ranked to low | |
|
| |
chAdyP0408
Posts : 437 Join date : 2009-11-18 Age : 34 Location : Denton, Texas
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 12:34 pm | |
| - zscott10 wrote:
- bludevilz444 wrote:
- its not pac 10 its preseason rankings man
you can't be that naive...who is voting and where do the live? In real life the Pac 10 is though of way higher than the Big East. People think of the Big East as a second rate BCS Conference | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 12:38 pm | |
| - chAdyP0408 wrote:
- Preseason ranking does have a lot to do with it. Look at 2004 when the top two ranked teams at the beginning of the season, USC and Oklahoma, both went undefeated and then preseason unranked Auburn also went undefeated. Look who eneded up in the championship WEST COAST USC and not undefeated Auburn who ran the gauntlet known as the SEC because they were never going to jump either team because they started ranked to low
Yes, pre-season rankings are huge, watch Alabama roll Texas this year cause they started out rated high....So a Pac 10 got the benefit of the doubt that year with SC...by the way, why not point out OU got the benny...
Yes, Auburn got screwed, just like I am now...so me another example of the PAC 10 screwing anyone out of a BCS bid since the system was put in? | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 12:41 pm | |
| - chAdyP0408 wrote:
- zscott10 wrote:
- bludevilz444 wrote:
- its not pac 10 its preseason rankings man
you can't be that naive...who is voting and where do the live? In real life the Pac 10 is though of way higher than the Big East. People think of the Big East as a second rate BCS Conference The PAC 10 is regarded as the 2nd best conferene by most experts...so the fact that an undefeated champ from the conf is not in a N/C game is an issue.... | |
|
| |
bludevilz444
Posts : 229 Join date : 2009-12-03 Location : Prosper Texas
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 12:47 pm | |
| the pac 10 is probably the third best conferance behind the big 12 and sec. okay i getting tired of argueing look cincy is in your out thats college go out and go undeafted again next year you did all that u cud | |
|
| |
clevmire1
Posts : 580 Join date : 2009-11-17 Age : 37 Location : Sydney, Australia
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 12:50 pm | |
| weel there are 3 undefeated conference champs so someone was always gonna miss out. If it happened 2 me yeah id be a bit upset but i wouldn't go on and on and on.
its a computer game, if u dont like it there is nothing we can do just stop playing it if it bugs u that much or u could win the rose bowl and prepare for a charge on the NC next year. | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 12:57 pm | |
| - clevmire1 wrote:
- weel there are 3 undefeated conference champs so someone was always gonna miss out. If it happened 2 me yeah id be a bit upset but i wouldn't go on and on and on.
its a computer game, if u dont like it there is nothing we can do just stop playing it if it bugs u that much or u could win the rose bowl and prepare for a charge on the NC next year. Aren't we both going on and on? like I said, I'm getting ready for RoseBowl...your the one that keep responding.... | |
|
| |
LongGONE24 Admin
Posts : 3230 Join date : 2009-10-09 Age : 35 Location : Windsor, Ontario
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:11 pm | |
| I love the dedication and genuine hurt for being left out boys but try and be respectful, alrite?
Bottom line - Stanford wasn't ranked high enough pre-season to climb quickly and early. Cincy did have the last week win over #8 1 loss Pitt. You're defenitely right, had you been SC and had the season you did - NC no doubt. But that's because you wouldn't have dropped out of the spot you would've been in (USC is #4 in this game pre season) and inevitably teams around you would have lost because a lot of them are in the same conference. That's where you got screwed, having an under 5* team in a conference that isn't Big 12 or the SEC. | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:15 pm | |
| - Macc24Est89 wrote:
- I love the dedication and genuine hurt for being left out boys but try and be respectful, alrite?
Bottom line - Stanford wasn't ranked high enough pre-season to climb quickly and early. Cincy did have the last week win over #8 1 loss Pitt. You're defenitely right, had you been SC and had the season you did - NC no doubt. But that's because you wouldn't have dropped out of the spot you would've been in (USC is #4 in this game pre season) and inevitably teams around you would have lost because a lot of them are in the same conference. That's where you got screwed, having an under 5* team in a conference that isn't Big 12 or the SEC. That's cool, I have moved on...I feel like we were being repectful?...and can you put Cincy on my Schedule for next year please?... | |
|
| |
chAdyP0408
Posts : 437 Join date : 2009-11-18 Age : 34 Location : Denton, Texas
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:20 pm | |
| Ya I think everyone is being respectful and arguing their point. I know if I was zscott and Stanford I would be ticked but hey if there are three undefeated someone has to be left out that's just how it is.
I think a Cincy-Stanford game would be a good matchup | |
|
| |
LongGONE24 Admin
Posts : 3230 Join date : 2009-10-09 Age : 35 Location : Windsor, Ontario
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:23 pm | |
| Okay okay. I just wanted to make sure everyones on the same page.
I wanted my rematch but I'm sure we'll cross paths eventually, Chris. You're OOC game will most defenitely be Cinci. | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:25 pm | |
| - Macc24Est89 wrote:
- Okay okay. I just wanted to make sure everyones on the same page.
I wanted my rematch but I'm sure we'll cross paths eventually, Chris. You're OOC game will most defenitely be Cinci. It's all good, it's just a vid game...but I want some W coast respect G lol! | |
|
| |
clevmire1
Posts : 580 Join date : 2009-11-17 Age : 37 Location : Sydney, Australia
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:27 pm | |
| hey why are u taking this out on me. wat about Iowa. lol and aren't we going with 3 user games next year. | |
|
| |
LongGONE24 Admin
Posts : 3230 Join date : 2009-10-09 Age : 35 Location : Windsor, Ontario
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:29 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
clevmire1
Posts : 580 Join date : 2009-11-17 Age : 37 Location : Sydney, Australia
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm | |
| - Macc24Est89 wrote:
- We are? lol
sweet. | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| |
| |
clevmire1
Posts : 580 Join date : 2009-11-17 Age : 37 Location : Sydney, Australia
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm | |
| - zscott10 wrote:
- clevmire1 wrote:
- hey why are u taking this out on me. wat about Iowa. lol
and aren't we going with 3 user games next year.
Na bra, it's not just you...sorry if it came off that way....Rose Bowl here we come! nah i would like to test myself against you 2. n if u gonna rep the west coast with 2pac i'll rep where i am from with this pic REPRESENT BIATCH | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| |
| |
bludevilz444
Posts : 229 Join date : 2009-12-03 Location : Prosper Texas
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:38 pm | |
| looks like stanford is our for blood | |
|
| |
clevmire1
Posts : 580 Join date : 2009-11-17 Age : 37 Location : Sydney, Australia
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 1:38 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
LongGONE24 Admin
Posts : 3230 Join date : 2009-10-09 Age : 35 Location : Windsor, Ontario
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 2:09 pm | |
| K that'll be three user games for you... when did we agree to have three? | |
|
| |
clevmire1
Posts : 580 Join date : 2009-11-17 Age : 37 Location : Sydney, Australia
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 2:13 pm | |
| we had that post and the majority voted for 3. | |
|
| |
Coach Gruden
Posts : 4402 Join date : 2009-11-17 Location : coeur d alene-idaho
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion Wed 23 Dec 2009, 2:16 pm | |
| - Macc24Est89 wrote:
- K that'll be three user games for you... when did we agree to have three?
I think 2 is good, and I want Iowa and Cincy please... | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Week Fourteen Discussion | |
| |
|
| |
| Week Fourteen Discussion | |
|